Digital imaging for reading of direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests from positive blood cultures.

Delaying effective antibiotic therapy is a major cause of sepsis-associated mortality. The EUCAST rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (RAST) is performed from positive blood cultures to provide rapid results. Disc diffusion tests inoculated with positive blood culture broth are read at 4, 6, and 8 h and interpreted against species and time-specific criteria. Potential problems are the possibility of missing specific reading times for tests and slower growth in incubators that are frequently opened. The current study aimed to assess if digital visualization by the BD Kiestra™ total laboratory automation system is suitable for reading RASTs by capturing images at the correct times and retaining them for review. Utilizing the Kiestra™ InoqulA, 100 µl of positive blood culture broth was lawn-inoculated onto Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 35 °C for automated digital zone measurement at 4, 6, and 8 h. Aliquots from 135 positive blood cultures were tested against EUCAST-recommended and other drugs and assessed for readability of digital images. Microdilution MICs were determined in parallel to RASTs. All isolates except 7/10 enterococci yielded images of suitable quality for zone measurement. Of the 641 digitally read tests for other organisms, 207 (32.3%) were readable in 4 h, 555 (86.6%) in 6 h, and 641 (100%) in 8 h. For tests included in EUCAST criteria, 92.1% provided categorical agreement with microdilution MICs. Digital image reading of RASTs is a potentially viable, inexpensive tool for providing rapid susceptibility results which can help reduce sepsis-associated mortality.

Automated preparation for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing: evaluation of a research use only prototype, the BD Kiestra IdentifA/SusceptA system.

OBJECTIVE: The current BD Kiestra™ total laboratory automation (TLA) system automates specimen inoculation, incubation, and digital visualization of cultures prior to initiation of manual or semi-automated identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The current study aimed to compare the performance, in a clinical setting, of a fully automated research-use-only prototype, BD Kiestra™ IdentifA/SusceptA (automated system), to our current BD Kiestra™ TLA which utilizes manual or semi-automated IDs and ASTs (current system). METHODS: Clinical samples yielding significant growth after processing by the BD Kiestra™ TLA were tested in parallel for ID and AST by both systems. IDs and ASTs were determined by Bruker matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and BD Phoenix, respectively, with data stored and managed in the BD EpiCenter™. The automated system used a common inoculum preparation for both tests, whereas the current system used separate inocula. Results were compared to assess agreement between the systems. RESULTS: On initial testing, 89% of IDs (466/523) and 92.4% of IDs (484/523) for the automated and current ID systems, respectively, yielded acceptable MALDI-TOF log scores of ≥1.7. On repeat testing, the respective acceptable scores were 97.1% (508/523) and 98.1% (513/523). For initial ASTs, the automated and current systems yielded 97.5% categorical agreement for 7325 drug-organism tests. After omitting discrepant MICs that differed by only one dilution and categorical discrepancies that were not reproducible, 0.2% unresolved discrepancies remained thus (99.8% categorical agreement). CONCLUSIONS: The automated prototype is suitable for development into technology that will provide clinical microbiology laboratories with significant advantages such as improved efficiency, standardization, reproducibility, reduced technical error and greater safety.